|
|
Association
of Biomolecular Resource Facilities
Business
Office:
2019
Galisteo Street
, Bldg. I,
Santa Fe
,
NM
87505
Tel: 505-983-8102
¨ Fax: 505-989-1073
¨ Email: abrf.org |
Re: PRG 2006 Quantitative Proteomics
Study
September 7, 2005
Dear Fellow ABRF Member,
A major challenge for core
facilities today is determining quantitative protein differences across complex
biological samples. Knowing how protein amounts differ between samples is
crucial for a large variety of experiments,
and determining these differences is commonly requested in many core
facilities. Although there are many techniques in the literature for determining
relative and absolute protein quantitation,
most if not all are non-routine and can be very challenging to implement
effectively. In addition, it is unknown how accurate these techniques are in
practice across multiple labs possessing
various levels of expertise. The Proteomics Research Group (PRG)
of the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) would like you to
participate in a collaborative study focusing on
evaluating different techniques for determining abundance
differences of several unknown proteins across two samples.
The primary goal of this study is to
give each laboratory an opportunity to evaluate its capabilities
and approaches with regard to:
• Determining quantitative
protein differences across two samples
• Effects of various quantitation techniques on your
ability to identify proteins
• The ability of software to determine quantitative
differences across samples or help
analyze data from quantitative experiments.
The PRG also plans to compile the
data in a way that will facilitate comparison of the strategies used
and aid in development of optimized protocols for these techniques. Laboratories
requesting samples will receive two mixtures (A & B) each containing up to
ten proteins. Ratios of proteins between samples will vary up to 1:100. Proteins
will be present in amounts suitable for the
use of mass spectrometric and/or 2D gel-methods to determine the relative
abundance ratios of proteins across the two mixtures. The PRG will request that
participants identify all available proteins and
return relative quantitative ratios of each protein. Participants
will also complete an anonymous web based questionnaire summarizing their
results, methods and instruments used in the
analysis.
This year’s study is again open to
both ABRF members and academic non-members. However, the
total number of samples is limited, and priority will be given to ABRF members.
Nonmembers are encouraged to join the ABRF
(For more information go to http://www.abrf.org).
The PRG anticipates distributing the
samples in October 2005, and requests that the resulting data
be returned by the end of November so that sufficient time will be available to
tabulate the results and to present them at
the 2006 ABRF Meeting (February 11-14, 2006 in Long Beach, CA).
Due to increased security concerns, additional information about the study
sample will be available if needed to
expedite the arrival of your sample. If this information is needed please
send a message to the email address noted in the
next paragraph and include “more info” in the subject
line.
Requests for samples must be
submitted by e-mail to prg_prg06@yahoo.com
prior to October 3, 2005. Please include the words
“sample request” in the subject line and provide
contact name, affiliation and complete mailing address in the body of the
message. Because of the significant effort
that goes into the preparation of the samples by the PRG, the research
group asks that samples only be requested if there is a reasonable probability
you will be able to return data by the
deadline. As in the past, result submissions will be coded to ensure anonymity
of the participating laboratories. A summary of the results of this study will
be available at the ABRF2006 meeting and will
be subsequently posted on the ABRF website.
We thank you for your support of the
ABRF and we look forward to your participation in this study.
Sincerely,
The ABRF Proteomics Research Group
Arnold M. Falick
Jeffrey A Kowalak
William Lane (EB liaison)
Kathryn Lilley (ad hoc)
Brett Phinney
Christoph Turck (chair)
Susan Weintraub
Ewa Witkowska
Nathan Yates
|