|

|
Networking
Education
Information Exchange |
|
"Mass Spectrometric Approaches to Proteomics"
POSTER ABSTRACTS
Thursday November 15, 2001
South San Francisco, CA USA
Exelixis, Inc.
click here for poster
bios
|
| |
|
|
| Poster |
Abstract |
| Poster:
"Metabolite Quantitation by LC/MS : Application to
Differential Phenotyping" by Curtis Hastings, SurroMed
Inc. chastings@surromed.com |
LC/MS
is rapidly becoming the technique of choice for
high-throughput
analysis of small volumes of biological fluid,
and is an integral part of SurroMed's biological
profiling platform.
Existing software and algorithms for mass spectrometry
data visualization and analysis are ill-equipped
to deal with the the number and complexity of LC/MS
spectra generated by high-throughput biomedical
studies. This talk
will describe a novel de-noising algorithm
based on the noise distribution of LC/MS data, and
a novel, general,
multidimensional algorithm for distinguishing
peaks from noise and
artifacts that can incorporate existing
knowledge and methods for identifying peaks in
individual mass
chromatograms and mass spectra. Together or separately,
these algorithms offer
significantly improved performance over current
methods. A new program for LC/MS data analysis and its
application to LC/MS spectra of biological samples will
be discussed.
|
Poster:
"Interfacing Surface Plasmon Resonance with Mass
Spectrometry" by
JoAnne Bruno, BiaCore Inc.
JBruno@biacoreinc.com |
In
an era when Proteomics promises to yield a comprehensive
understanding of
proteins and their roles, Biacore's surface plasmon
resonance (SPR)
based instruments are poised to play a central role in
addressing all
aspects of proteome analysis. Biacore instruments
facilitate protein
separation and identification, provide real-time,
quantitative, functional
information in a reproducible manner, and provide a
versatile and
powerful approach to Proteomics because of the ability
to complement current
techniques, such as 2-D gels and mass spectrometry. The
combination of SPR and
mass spectrometry has increased the opportunity
for identification and
secondary characterization of binding partners
through the use of a
single analytical tool. The latest techniques
for integrating
Biacore systems with mass spectrometry will be
discussed. Additionally,
multiple examples will be presented to demonstrate
how these two
technologies are combined in real life situations to
yield maximum
information in a minimum amount of time. |
Poster:
"A Novel Appraoch to MALDI-TOF
Sample Preparation" by Keith
Compson
MicroMass
keith.compson@micromass.co.uk |
MALDI-TOF-MS has become one of the most well
established techniques for the
analysis of biological samples. This has been mainly due to its ease of use and relative
insensitivity to biological matrixes
which are used in the preparation of
most biological samples.
However, it has been
previously demonstrated that
removing these contaminants can
significantly improve the quality of
the resulting spectra.
Furthermore, MALDI-TOF-MS is
now a technique which is routinely
automated for both the sample
preparation and analysis of many
biological samples, which include
those resulting from a proteomics
experiment.
Clearly, any method of sample
preparation developed for
MALDI-TOF-MS applications must be
amenable to full automation.
Presented in this poster is a new
plate design for sample preparation
of biological samples (patent
pending). The plate design allows
for the concentration of very dilute
samples and the removal of inorganic
salt contamination.
The whole sample preparation
procedure is performed in full upon
the MALDI-TOF-MS sample stage.
Presented in the poster is
the optimized plate design and
preparation methods to significantly
improve the quality of the resulting
MS spectrum compared with
conventional MALDI sample
preparation.
The MALDI sample
preparation of protein digests
resulting from in gel digestion of
gel spots from 2D gel
electrophoresis are evaluated.
It is shown in this poster
that the sensitivity of the mass
spectrometer is dramatically
improved.
The method is compared with
alternative methods of sample
preparation and its amenability for
automation is demonstrated. |
|
|